While the world of fitness trackers may have started out with watches, it soon moved on to other forms: Smart rings like Oura, and now arm bands have joined the chat. One of the most well-known of the latter is Whoop, a wearable that eschews the screen—and the distractions that come with it—in favor of a simple design made to stay on 24/7.
I was already trying out the Whoop 4.0 when news of their latest release hit. The Whoop 5.0 (free, but requires an annual membership ranging from $199 to $359, whoop.com) launched in May, promising better battery life, a sleeker design, and new longevity-focused data points (who doesn’t want to biohack their aging?!). Curious whether these new features warranted an upgrade, I swapped my 4.0 for the Whoop 5.0 for over a month to find out.
How I tested
I started wearing the Whoop 4.0 in the beginning of April—smack-dab in the middle of a half-marathon-training cycle. By the time the 5.0 hit shelves, the Whoop universe already had about six weeks of my data already logged, meaning it “knew” a lot about me (including baseline health metrics like resting heart rate and breathing rate). After I switched to the new 5.0, I wore it for five weeks. I followed the 24/7 model for wear, keeping it on all day (showering included) and all night, taking it off only for a wedding and for a couple days on a trip after its battery died.
Wearing the Whoop 5.0
The first thing I noticed upon unboxing the 5.0 was that the new design does look a little more refined: It has a lower profile, meaning slightly less likely to snag. I also tried it with the SuperKnit Luxe Band (included with Life, the highest membership tier), and the smart silver clasp gave it a slightly more sophisticated look than my 4.0’s black one.